As a result of a stunning turn, the province of San Diego closes the case of the murder of Jane Dorothy

Read Time:2 Minute, 44 Second

The San Diego District Attorney’s Office on Monday abruptly dropped charges of murder ahead of Jane Dorothy’s second trial, two decades after a Vista jury found her guilty of killing her husband Robert near their home in the Valley Center.

The stunning announcement came immediately after the jury was called last week; the selection of the final panel was scheduled for Monday.

Dorothy spent 20 years in prison before being released in April 2020, as her lawyers successfully claimed that the then 73-year-old girl was at risk of contracting a coronavirus and then went through part of the state prison system. Her application for a new lawsuit was based on new evidence developed by a team of lawyers from the Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent, which took over her case in 2015.

Dorothy was convicted of killing her husband Robert in February 2000. His body was found on the side of the road near the family ranch Valley Center. She reported his disappearance on the evening of 13 February 2000, informing authorities that she had last seen him the same day he was preparing to flee. She was arrested two days later.

At the time, she was a successful high-level executive in a mental health campaign that raised and trained horses at the Family Ranch Valley Center. She has long pleaded not guilty.

In court, prosecutors claimed she killed and strangled Robert Dorothy in their bedroom, moved his body from the bedroom down and out the door into a pickup truck, then drove some distance away and dumped the body.

The case against her was almost indirect, relying on forensic examination, such as the crime scene and blood tests. There were no witnesses.

After years of unsuccessful appeals by Dorothy, lawyers for the Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent took up her case and soon focused on forensic science. In 2019, a judge ruled that the blood tests and DNA evidence used in her trial were erroneous, and scheduled a hearing to determine whether her sentence should be overturned.

Then in July 2020, the prosecutor’s office took the unusual step of recognizing them could no longer defend herself initial belief. They referred to new DNA findings as well as problems in the criminal lab. However, a few months later, the agency announced that it would look for her in court again.

Lawyers for the Project for the Innocent methodically analyzed almost every aspect of the case in which Dorothy was convicted, from DNA evidence to blood tests, evidence of blood spatters and analysis of tire prints at the crime scene by experts from the California Patrol Service. .

The inspection revealed errors in the forensic examination of the case, which disturbed the working records of some forensic scientists at the San Diego Regional Criminal Laboratory, which had never been detected before, and allegations that the San Diego District Attorney’s Office had closed for years. evidence.

Source by [author_name]

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
Previous post The combination of drugs reduces the risk of asthma attacks
Next post The shooting erupted near Walmart in Victorville, and two were injured